- #KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE PDF#
- #KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE SERIAL#
- #KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE DRIVER#
- #KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE SOFTWARE#
- #KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE SERIES#
Detractors cite challenges in capturing the subgingival with the size 1.5 and also that size two sensors yield the largest possible image for the same dose of radiation.Ĭonclusion: Both DEXIS and Apteryx offer easy-to- use interfaces and efficient workflows. The theory behind the DEXIS size 1.5 sensor is that it’s easier to position than a larger size two sensor, speeding the process of taking an FMX. Because DEXIS Imaging Suite is really optimized to work with DEXIS sensors, the overall workflow is heavily influenced by the hardware design.
#KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE SOFTWARE#
While not strictly a software workflow issue, DEXIS is also unique in the industry in having a one size fits all sensor (versus the typical size one and size two sensor).
#KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE SERIES#
FMX’s are chronologically layered with the individual tooth images being overlayed and accessed through a series of cascading movable tiles. DEXIS has an interface that’s pretty unique to dental imaging. Apteryx, along with most other imaging software providers, follows a more traditional approach of chronologically arranged thumbnails that are individually selected and then activated with a side-by-side comparison feature. I think a great analogy is Apple and Microsoft – while the interfaces are different, and fans may have near religious beliefs about their particular camp, both MacOS and Windows are very functional, capable personal computer operating systems.Īs an example of the differences, Apteryx and DEXIS use very distinct paradigms for doing longitudinal image comparison (comparing the same x-rays taken at different appointments). Once again though, the design approaches, look and feel, and workflow are very different in some respects. User Interface and Workflowīoth DEXIS and Apteryx are easy to use and have intuitive interfaces. If you plan to mix and match hardware from multiple vendors an open solution from Apteryx might be preferred.
#KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE DRIVER#
Connecting with competitive hardware brands may not be quite as convenient and will often rely on TWAIN driver integrations, which are much “clickier” and less data rich than direct integrations.Ĭonclusion: DEXIS Imaging Suite may be a good option for practices that are highly committed to DEXIS hardware.
#KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE SERIAL#
Direct integrations are the gold standard in connectivity because they offer greater efficiency (less clicks) and capture all of the metadata from the connected device such as serial numbers, manufacturer and model, as well as critical exposure information such as the mA (milliamperes of current used), and kVp (peak kilovoltage).ĭEXIS is going to integrate well and have direct integrations with their own hardware brands. Apteryx is first and foremost an imaging software company built on a “open” architecture value proposition.Īs an open platform, Apteryx is going to have a lot more direct integrations with the universe of dental hardware devices than DEXIS. DEXIS is a hardware-first company and has traditionally been a “closed” architecture platform. On this issue, DEXIS and Apteryx have been at opposite ends of the spectrum regarding their design philosophies. Comparing DEXIS Software to Apteryx Hardware IntegrationĮasy integration with your preferred hardware suppliers is an important consideration in selecting your imaging software. My goals are straightforward - to simplify the research process allowing you to walk away satisfied with whichever system you choose. In this article I will offer some key categories for comparing the DEXIS Imaging Suite with solutions available from Apteryx.
So, we also accept that in some cases one product or the other may be a better fit. The fact is that DEXIS and Apteryx approach things fundamentally differently in some very important areas. We don’t mind acknowledging other quality solutions and we know that we’re not the only imaging company out there. Your research process will likely point you to the market leaders and choosing between several strong options can be difficult.Īs one of the top imaging software providers for over 25 years, we at Apteryx have often found our solutions, XrayVision and XVWeb, on the top of a short list with the DEXIS Imaging Suite from Kavo (formerly Kavo Kerr).
Taking and reading radiographs is central to your daily practice workflow and production.
#KAVO DEXIS PLATINUM PIXEL SIZE PDF#
Image-comparison grip-lines arrow-top-right zip arrow-right video minus arrow-back text shop twitter file home quick-order arrow-left youtube search arrow-down check all filter site_references image Slice 1 zoom 🎬 icons / _ icon size / _ download-queueĬhevron-down arrow-right picture pdf podcast exe plus hotline close xxx-1 burger clipboard linked-in ppt Artboard 🎬 icons / _ icon size / _ download-queue_addĬreated by potrace 1.Selecting the imaging software solution for your practice is not a decision to be made lightly.
0 kommentar(er)
